<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Armchair Playmaker &#187; Referees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://armchairplaymaker.com/tag/referees/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://armchairplaymaker.com</link>
	<description>Discussing The Best and Worst of Both Rugby Codes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:07:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Players = Wins?</title>
		<link>http://armchairplaymaker.com/2008/06/players-wins.html</link>
		<comments>http://armchairplaymaker.com/2008/06/players-wins.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rugby Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Referees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairplaymaker.com/http:/armchairplaymaker.com/2008/06/players-wins.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the United States&#8217; continuing struggles in international rugby at all levels, Armchair Playmaker though it might be helpful to provide a look at some baseline comparisons.  The International Rugby Board&#8217;s site has great player registration statistics, etc., easily available for participating national unions, and we&#8217;ve used them to create this table comparing how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the United States&#8217; <a href="http://armchairplaymaker.com/2008/06/winless-weekend-for-north-american.html" target="blank">continuing struggles in international rugby at all levels</a>, Armchair Playmaker though it might be helpful to provide a look at some baseline comparisons.  The International Rugby Board&#8217;s site has great player registration statistics, etc., easily available for participating national unions, and we&#8217;ve used them to create this table comparing how many people play rugby union across the nations.</p>
<p>For parsimony, we&#8217;ve included only figures for each country who has been a <a href="http://www.rugbyworldcup.com/" target="blank">Rugby World Cup</a> champion or runner-up since the tournament&#8217;s inception in <a href="http://www.worldcupweb.com/WCrugby/results/1987.asp" target="blank">1987</a>, along with the United States.  We&#8217;ve also used these figures to calculate the percentage of each nation&#8217;s population that plays rugby union, the number of referees, and the number of referees per player.  Click the chart below for a closer look:</p>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_bGR9Hptq8cc/SFHn7XNwLWI/AAAAAAAAABg/qJTLQiKnUFM/s1600-h/RugbyPlayersPerNation.GIF" target="blank"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_bGR9Hptq8cc/SFHn7XNwLWI/AAAAAAAAABg/qJTLQiKnUFM/s400/RugbyPlayersPerNation.GIF" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5211201250874371426" /></a></p>
<p>As you can see, all of the nations listed but Australia have at least twice as many players in the nation as the United States does.  England has more than ten times as many.  Additionally, the gap in popularity by proportion is perhaps more instructive.  Every World Cup winner but Australia have at least one registered rugby union player for every 100 people in their population.  In rugby-mad New Zealand, three of every 100 souls play.  France, which has been in two finals but hasn&#8217;t yet won the trophy, is a bit lower with three in a thousand.  </p>
<p>Meanwhile, the United States has one rugby union player for every five thousand people in their population.  Of course, these figures don&#8217;t take into account factors such as what level these players are playing at, how many are male and female, what the development infrastructure is, etc., but the general picture should give a little bit of an idea of the challenge the U.S. side faces in terms of player pools.  </p>
<p>Interestingly, the U.S. number of referees per player rate is not too far off compared to a lot of nations, but you may want to consider that this won&#8217;t reflect the rate of full-time referees, etc., which is very low in the United States.  </p>
<p>Some have called the United States a &#8220;<a href="http://www.rugbyworldcup.com/home/news/newsid=2012765.html" target="blank">sleeping giant</a>&#8221; in rugby union (though one of those people has <a href="http://www.rugbyrugby.com/opinions/write_of_reply/story_14508164102.php" target="blank">said a few less promising things</a> since).  If that&#8217;s the case, these figures give an idea of how deep the slumber is.</p>
<p>Just for fun, we&#8217;ve also compared the figures for the World Cup winners and runners-up to how many players there are per World Cup win to see who&#8217;s getting the best return on their player resources. Click to have a look:</p>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_bGR9Hptq8cc/SFHudsVZQSI/AAAAAAAAABo/f-8IlAFvIRs/s1600-h/RugbyPlayersPerRWCWin.GIF" target="blank"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_bGR9Hptq8cc/SFHudsVZQSI/AAAAAAAAABo/f-8IlAFvIRs/s400/RugbyPlayersPerRWCWin.GIF" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5211208437728887074" /></a></p>
<p>Of course, these numbers don&#8217;t take into count a lot of factors.  The present numbers don&#8217;t say anything about how many people played in a nation several years ago, for example.  The nature of the game and player development have also changed a lot since the advent of <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/rugby_union/4392795.stm" target="blank">professionalism</a> in 1995, which was after three World Cups had already been played.  Considering these and other factors, that last chart needs to be taken with a grain of salt.  All the same, it looks like whatever Australia is doing, they need to keep doing it!  England has over 20 times as many players per World Cup win, and even New Zealand has four times as many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://armchairplaymaker.com/2008/06/players-wins.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global ELVs Trial: Whither the Lower-Level Refs?</title>
		<link>http://armchairplaymaker.com/2008/05/global-elvs-trial-whither-lower-refs.html</link>
		<comments>http://armchairplaymaker.com/2008/05/global-elvs-trial-whither-lower-refs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rugby Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Referees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairplaymaker.com/http:/armchairplaymaker.com/2008/05/global-elvs-trial-whither-the-lower-level-refs.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Armchair Playmaker is a big fan of the Experimental Law Variations that rugby union has been exploring for the last few years, so we&#8217;re generally happy to see that 13 of them will be used in a one-year global trial from 1 August 2008. In general, the ELVs are meant to make the game quicker [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Armchair Playmaker is a big fan of the Experimental Law Variations that rugby union has been exploring for the last few years, so we&#8217;re generally happy to see that <a href="http://www.irb.com/newsmedia/mediazone/pressrelease/newsid=2023546.html#irb+announces+global+trial+elvs" target="_blank">13 of them will be used in a one-year global trial from 1 August 2008</a>. In general, the ELVs are meant to make the game quicker and easier to understand for players, referees, and supporters alike. For more on the ELVs and their application, see the <a href="http://www.irb.com/mm/Document/NewsMedia/0/IRBELVGuideENFINAL_5097.pdf" target="_blank">guide released by the International Rugby Board</a>.</p>
<p>Some detractors, such as 2007 IRB player of the year Bryan Habana, claim that the ELVs will <a href="http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/02/19/habana-slams-super-14s-elvs/" target="_blank">make rugby union more like rugby league</a>. If he means that <a href="http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,23374501-5006067,00.html" target="_blank">we&#8217;ll actually start seeing some tries</a>, perhaps he&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>In any case, the ELVs will surely get interesting when they hit the lower levels. In Armchair Playmaker&#8217;s homeland of the United States, for example, there are over 76,000 registered members of <a href="http://usarugby.org/" target="_blank">USA Rugby</a>. A lot of those members are players refereed by part-timers making 50 USD or so to referee a match. A lot of them rely on general memories from their playing days for most of their laws know-how, leading to more than a few errors on the finer points of advantage, when to award a 22-meter dropout vs. a 5-meter scrum, how crooked a lineout throw has to be to merit a sanction, when to award a free kick instead of a penalty, etc., etc. How will they handle the ELVs?</p>
<p>Armchair Playmaker says full speed ahead. If a lot of lower-level referees are getting things wrong already, then maybe a major law overhaul will force them to learn not just the ELVs, but those laws they should already know. And if not, then they&#8217;ll just get the new laws wrong just as they did the old ones. If the ELVs make the sport more exciting, then more interest = more new referees. Maybe they&#8217;ll be more studious than some of the old ones!</p>
<p>What do you think? Comment below and share your thoughts on the ELVs and how you think they&#8217;ll be handled by referees, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://armchairplaymaker.com/2008/05/global-elvs-trial-whither-lower-refs.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

